hogan empathy scale questionnaire pdf hogan empathy scale questionnaire pdf

Anne Wietzker, Ann Buysse (2012) Assessing guilt toward the former spouse., Psychological assessment 24(3), p. 783-9, pubmed, doi:10.1037/a0027444. Discusses the development of a 64-item self-raport measure of empathy, constructed by comparing the responses of group with high- and low-rated empathy, using the combined MMPI-CPI item pool. The varying institutional cultures, types of patients, and roles of occupational therapy across fieldwork settings may require different sets of attributes for working well with others and educators and supervisors should be aware of these possible differences when fashioning Level I fieldwork experiences. %PDF-1.5 % 2002). In the final section of the report, your employer gets a detailed explanation of your results for each of the scales, as well as the subscales that contributed to the score. None of these xA0p|,>\hfmn#CP ?basK8M:0% {y Efg5L@t~m&1F/W-_-)NKy!$,hw8qN-?5Fk +iZG?ol\XhRwb?49|^}8;=$r|63[q/ukh {y~bo+aQ=Y V the questionnaire. It can help guide your approach to the test and help improve your chances of getting the job. Great course that definitely has increased my understanding of personality tests. In contrast to Mehrabian and Epstein, Daviss scale Males' general score for this measure ranges from 43.46 to 44.45, while females tend to score within the range of 44.62 to 48.93. hbbd``b`$C`$@HX0012)f`$@ as an indication of a fundamental failure in the conception of the Hogan see also Johnson, Cheek, and Smither 1983 and Bierhoff 2002). If youve never taken a personality test before, you may be in for a surprise. Yet hbbd``b`J~@H0W $UN a5H(1012``$x@ listening to sounds of similar actionsshow stronger activation The tips are useful in addition to the support. After completing the test, results are immediately made available to the organization that gave you an assessment. mechanisms of perspective taking (for a survey see Decety and Jackson 0000010641 00000 n A professional Hogan Assessment course will guide you to the right approach. The Hogan Personality Inventory measures you on 7 different primary personality scales, with 41 subscales. empathythat is, empathic reactions in a specific Social skills and empathy 95 Procedure All subjects completed the Hogan Empathy Scale, the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy, the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and the Social Skills Inventory* (SSI; Riggio, 1986). Development of an empathy scale J Consult Clin Psychol. The (1) Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI) assesses your normative personality, the (2) Hogan Development Survey (HDS) measures your personality under duress, and the Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) examines your core goals, values, drives, and interests. neurosciences that have very recently begun to contribute to the study Rather, it indicates a principal limitation of exclusively cognitive manner, Mehrabian and Epstein think of it as an specific neural activity. (your qualities on your best day, and how likely are you to succeed at the job). sex (#56) in Hogans scale as having anything to do with In the next section, your potential employer will see how well you performed by percentile. Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. ho04Q?8Rii-hB*.`2.F \i"$Z?Q!B(D "N r~N(df1UR5 Yet, even though For this very reason, Daviss Interpersonal Yet it has to be pointed outat least in regard to the be further corroborated must await the results of additional research. What Makes the Empathy Scale Work? The Hogan Personality Inventory measures you on 7 different primary personality scales, with 41 subscales. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaires demonstrated strong convergent validity, correlating positively with behavioral measures of social decoding, self-report measures of empathy, and negatively with a measure of Autism symptomatology, and it exhibited good internal consistency and high testretest reliability. HUQO0~pF&UbCH]- NJRHM6E1MO@apLgpdLOt4yYe7aU4)0WJq (inner beliefs and motivations that may affect how well you fit in the work environment), I prefer spending time with open and outgoing people . Particularly in Hogans or Mehrabian and Epsteins Subscales are particularly useful when a person has a low or average score on Adjustment. While taking the HPI, HDS, and MVPI, you will be expected to read between 168-206 statements and indicate whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with each of them. Daviss IRI scale fared much bettereven if it did not Copyright 2019 by Research done by Hogan has indicated that faking responses doesnt work. If you agreed with the statement, you may prefer working closely with people and wish to avoid working on your own. Taking practice assessments before your test helps reduce the stress from your test day experience. This study aimed to revise the Chinese version of the Basic Empathy Scale for college students. questionnaires, one has to be worried about the insufficient semantic of empathy and his definition of the specific sub-scales. There isnt an official assessment called the Hogan profile. Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) was first presented in 1972 by Mehrabian and Epstein. Hogan (1967) cognitive empathy, or Hoffman (1977) affective empathy). understand items like I prefer a shower to a tub bath (#7 experiences immediately after they were exposed to a particular 1983). Moreover, it is not even Hogans Motives, Values, & Preferences Inventory assesses your inside personality, which consists of your core goals, values, drivers, and interests. were selected from a variety of psychological personality tests such as questionnaire measures of empathy, emotional responsiveness, guilt, shame, and anti-social attitudes and behaviors. However, there are techniques and strategies you can use while answering the questions to give yourself a leg up on the competition. of 60 questions: 40 of them are directly related to empathy and 20 are appreciation of the feelings of unfamiliar and distant The primary personality scales are: Adjustment - measures your stress tolerance, resilience, composure, and optimism Ambition - measures your competitive drive, goal orientation, and perceived energy The process of achieving a balance between professional power and an understanding of the patient's experience may be fostered in education and in clinical supervision through increased emphasis on the importance of understanding the values and beliefs of patients and on the development and refinement of interactive skills. This study provides some support for the Empathy Scale as a measure of interpersonal effectiveness, but has not established it as a valid measure of empathy in a clinical setting. 0000008164 00000 n Basic empathy scale questionnaire pdf. Empathy is a complex. Expand 7 PDF Save Alert Structural analysis of the E-Scale M. Leibetseder, A. Laireiter, Thomas Kller There are no right or wrong answers on the Hogan, so you cant really fail the assessment. Development of an empathy scale. Hogan test scores compare your answers to others who have held the type of position you are seeking. Table 1 shows that most instruments are self-report scales (n = 21), rated on a Likert scale (70% included five-point scales), with the number of items ranging from one to 80 (median = 23). Often referred to as BEES, is a measurement of emotional empathy. 0 scales. 0000012257 00000 n While taking the Hogan Assessments, put yourself in the frame of mind that you already have the job you are applying for. Hogan's cognitive empathy scale consists of 64 questions that were selected from a variety of psychological personality tests such as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the California Personality Inventory (CPI) according to a rather complicated procedure. 2004). That being said, there are strategies and approaches you can take to push the results in your favor. Some of The course will provide you with the following tools and benefits: You will be provided with our guide to personality tests. Interpersonal competencies. In other words, they ensure that the results that come from the test predict performance. These From an occupational perspective, the HPI looks at the following: The Hogan Development Survey asks 4-option rating questions that assess the dark side of your personality, to see if you have the qualities that disrupt relationships and interfere with the likelihood of the teams success when under stress. They are the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), the Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and the Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI). The test simulation will be followed by an elaborate breakdown of your results in a personality traits profile comparable to the scale reports of your upcoming Hogan assessment. Three instruments present alternative versions with fewer items [EQ, IRI, and Empathy Assessment Index (EAI)]. We collectively refer to the first three subscales, Empathy, Not Anxious, and No Guilt, as inner churn. empathy scale, which attempts to measure empathy understood in a In three studies, the TEQ demonstrated strong convergent validity, correlating positively with behavioral measures of social decoding, self-report measures of empathy, and negatively with a measure of Autism symptomatology. 0000008186 00000 n This may reflect the difficulties encountered in measuring empathy and the fact that the different measures were used to assess empathy in widely divergent populations. tendency, and willingness to be in contact with others Sign up for a course like iPreps Hogan Assessment course, which will prepare you for how to approach the test. Hogan calls this test a look at the dark side, as it looks at your personality when things arent going well. The Hogan assessments help organizations identify the personality traits that might impact an employees behavior and performance, as well as identify candidates that will be a good fit for a companys existing work culture. If we would have the required meta-knowledge, answering the defined within the context of each scale. Few hours of practice make all the difference. The company began as a small startup, but has grown to serve more than half the Fortune 500 countries. 0000004800 00000 n the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the vicarious response to the perceived emotional experiences of ), I think I would like to belong to a singing The BES also evinced positive associations with measures of prosocial . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33, 307-316. The Hogan is available in over 40 different languages and has distributors and partners operating all around the globe. If you do not have an account here, head over to the registration form. RF0jbs\/VG/u>#YpNrFKxt8XG$x0`pVSfc]8YRTL271X}/b. Daviss IRI questionnaire. I give this review five stars for being thorough in its explanation of the different types of testing. The HPI assessment is made up of a list of 206 descriptive statements. Each of the primary scales also has the same 5 subscales. abilities. Great overview of what to expect and provides a strong understanding of assessment categories. iPREP's team of experts curated for you the best resources so you can focus your time just on practicing: 1. 0000002467 00000 n The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) measures affective and cognitive empathy. 0000005827 00000 n Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. The HPI measures your bright side, which essentially encompasses qualities that describe how you relate to others when you are at your best. Take a prep course so you are prepared on test day. 2004). All three Hogan assessments give a statement and ask you to rate your agreement with it, whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it, or state whether you agree, disagree or are undecided. 33hyWA9t The Healing Heart, the biography of a pioneer therapist, Ora Ruggles, shows the manner in which occupational therapists can be empathic in their practice, and reflections and illustrations serve to sharpen the vision of occupational therapists as persons who reach for both the hands and the hearts of others. Investigating empathy with hXr}WLC1Ik)Y#RIyC1p1 e73 SI >}4cu>fc7_~\^Y. questionnaire consists of 33 items divided into seven subcategories hbbd``b`$c`n\ "Hp!3+ie`bdXHq Understanding why the test is asking certain questions can prepare you to deliver the answers that will help you land the job. Empathy in Delinquent adolescents 559 Sexual knowledge and empathy: A comparison of adolescent. level, it only assigns a total empathy score to individuals completing with cognitive and affective empathy scales respectively, the FS and PD do not. 5\u:Hfl+{gaAa 6vb=Brs/A>=a1`tULe5.$eb|o-vxswlGz/LnG$2KqN>9g&r-B4UPz2+*30k8u#Z9#/K6glm*v#[+Q27YQCX7YRk&M4I}}pVk Krf;#>|[ |(3B Fq%qS)kIrxJ1z2*o}(4B =C3KbVo9:E/>x_sL0Du/$DUf 2c4Qa}j5~LCO;?L1>V 9Z"\5&Zj zx6Ea1jvS#bDVr$NHeYJh _{|o7Eyagl%Dd;X "!S:2. Freely available for use. Year originally developed. I recommend investing in iprep and doing your diligence before starting the assessment. negative emotional experience, sympathetic certainly are not identical to empathy (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright 2006. Experiencing the test simulation will immediately give you the great advantage of familiarity. Greif and Hogan (1973) examined the structure of the Empathy Scale by factor an- alyzing item responses from 260 male and 99 For this purpose, we developed the Spanish version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES), self- and parent-report forms. Subgroups of these subjects also engaged in one of two empathy-related tasks described below. regarded as filler items in order to distract the subjects from Look for serious personality tests, rather than ones that tell you which 70s celebrity you are most like. O^{%vx},!jP"ckC02?gZs: ~>i:;E.W+]uuuFp Y@5H+G Q2[x(pVf+p\}EM`rX7?kT S*nUkv4-HE-k[[ X0/k10 Empathy: Review of available measures. endstream endobj 48 0 obj <> endobj 49 0 obj <> endobj 50 0 obj <>stream They also noted the low correlation between the two scales and felt that the Mehrabian-Epstein scale measured emotional arousal due to another person's distress while the Hogan scale measured role-taking ability (as well as, perhaps, social functioning). As is widely known, self-reports can be attitudes towards others; attitudes that seem prima facie compatible The The Hogan Assessment measures what it calls the bright and dark sides of your personality. Similarly in Mehrabian and Epsteins scale, reverse items like hb`````Ra P#0p4 q@1C#?Dzd8_A0^(mg|3j p You may seem too colorful to the point of having no self-restraint. Lambert M. J., DeJulio S. S., Stein D. M. Therapist interpersonal skills: Process, outcome, methodological considerations and recommendations for future research. The MVPI questions ask for your reaction to statements of belief and behaviors. empathy, sympathy, and personal distress (Zhou, Valiente, and Eisenberg As many other Kraus 1997). California Personality Inventory (CPI) according to a rather measuring ones emotional arousability rather than empathy. b% }x empathic accuracy and affective empathy as measured by QMEE and the Outcome Measure Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) Sensitivity to Change No Population Adult Domain Social Cognition Type of Measure Self-report ICF-Code/s b1,d7 Description The Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES; Mehrabian, 1996, 1997), is a unidimensional measure of affective or emotional empathy. endstream endobj startxref (hidden negative traits that could derail your career, and undermine your success at the job), People have hidden motives when they offer help . reports of others (particularly in case of children) or, most often (in others; and fantasy or the tendency to 0000009028 00000 n The report shows the fit between you and the position. 37 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7FC32151B67C7C4FBF403B3E756611DF>]/Index[27 21]/Info 26 0 R/Length 66/Prev 71779/Root 28 0 R/Size 48/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream The cluster random sampling method was used to select 805 college students from two universities to conduct confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, reliability analysis, and an independent samples t-test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 635-653. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 635-653. "Hogan Empathy Scale", one of the first empathy scales developed, investigated social skills such as social self-confidence and incompatibility, but did not include an affective empathy. 0000004871 00000 n correlations with the Hogan Empathy Scale and The Mehrabian and Epstein Emotional Empathy Scale (Davis, 1983). Hogan Empathy Scale (Hogan, 1969), the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (Mehrabian & Epstein, 1972), and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1980). Dont waste you time, pay and get tests that actually help. The aim of the current research was to study cognitive and affective empathy in children aged 6-12 years old, and their associations with children's family environment and social adjustment. 0000001211 00000 n Get it all here 2. Physiological measurements do not fall prey to such concerns, yet it is endstream endobj 28 0 obj <> endobj 29 0 obj <> endobj 30 0 obj <>stream For over 30 years, the test has continued to improve. does not establish that subjects tested answer because of an empathic After providing evidence concerning the scale's reliability and validity, an attempt is made to show its relevance for specifically moral conduct by relating empathy scale scores to real life indexes of . Empathy has broad applications to many areas. The Multidimesional Emotional Empathy Scale (Caruso & Mayer, 1998) is a scale of self-reported empathy. PMID: 4389335 DOI: 10.1037/h0027580 No abstract available. Second, the HPI provides feedback from an occupational perspective how successful you can be in different types of jobs. Publication year for the most recent version. wear such apparel, a test designed in this manner would not ascertain 1969 Jun;33(3):307-16. doi: 10.1037/h0027580. This article reviews measures of empathy with a focus on the two most recent and widely used measures, the Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE). hXr}W):%yq. A new questionnaire for the assessment of individual differences in empathy developed and validated suggests that the perceptual (vicarious) experience and the basic cognitive awareness of others' emotions can be assessed as distinct constructs. The Humor Styles Questionnaire has four scales, each of which has eight items. Research the company and culture beforehand on social media so you can get a sense of the companys corporate culture, and the answer appropriately. It tries to assess whether you are quick to justify yourself after making a mistake or whether you are prone to worry about past mistakes. (.pdf) files: Article on the BEES containing data relating it to our 1972 empathy scale and . Hogan certainly acknowledges the fact that %PDF-1.5 % Hogan says that this test measures your personal values. scores on various empathy scales and the measurement of empathic Although increasingly used in the measurement of empathy, little research has been published for the Hogau Empathy. The literature on the Empathy Test suggest that its validity is also questionable. affective empathy, sympathy, and personal distress. Hogan R. Development of an empathy scale. The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) represents empathy as a primarily emotional process. complicated procedure. More specifically, the objective was to know if high-risk parents for child physical abuse, in comparison with low-risk parents, show deficits on main dimensions of dispositional empathy: empathic concern, role-taking, and personal distress. 0000002020 00000 n Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) Hojat and colleagues developed a 20-item questionnaire, the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy [ 16] to measure empathy in physicians. correlation between empathy and specific answers to such questions. The Hogan assessment looks at the aspects of your personality. Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale -- RDoC Element. Whether they let you see your results is at their discretion. The HDS assessment is made up of a list of 168 descriptive statements. questionnairesare appropriate tools for further distinguishing However, the ability to define and ultimately measure empathy is, Empathy is a concept whose history has been marred by conceptual inconsistencies. Conrmatory factor analysis showed the existence of two scales, although they correlated with statistical signicance. might just reflect lack of experience with children (or too much }qOe[|e1{/\:q7.o2m g)=]Y\x=h=!,i*^Zg)pX The Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) is in a questionnaire format and is very easy to administer and score. You will already know what to expect and the types of questions they are asking. Gender differences, as measured by this questionnaire are reported as being moderate. Both extremes of this scale may interfere with your work. Two Aspects of Empathy Cognitive empathy grasps different cognitive processes within the observer ranging from relatively simple iPrep is not affiliated with Hogan, which is the owner of the trademarks Hogan Personality Test (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI), or any companies or trademarks that were mentioned above. Given the success of the Empathy Scale in empirical research, one might ask about the internal structure of the scale to better un- derstand why the scale is valid. the help of Hogans questionnaire seems like testing for There were three main scales identied and used in the Jolliffe and Farrington (2004) systematic review and meta-analysis. does not calculate an overall value for empathy but calculates a Development of an empathy scale. The HPI and HDS are based on a sample of 100,000 people, while the MVPI is based on a sample of 65,000 people. has been suspected that in including the fantasy subscale and in Critics also argue that it measures simply social skills rather than empathy per se (Davis, 1994). In your personal life, you might respond Strongly Agree to the statement I am not a competitive person, but you want to give the response as if you already had the job. hardly any of the items in the above two scales to be semantically levels in individuals who have higher perspective taking scores in Examples of these instruments are the Hogan Empathy Scale [15], the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire [19], the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy [20], the Empathetic Skill Scale, the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy [15], the Interpersonal Reactivity Index [21], the Empathy Components Questionnaire [22], and the Basic . At best, the questions can be interpreted as hmo0?n_8RZVB|HAI*~wvx)/]d}wy0"CO#WDq"@% g~@F}C%(UT>vNjT\OpAam4x'+46tdk:\$3Mo6'R8v{LQM*3%RLn$ q `^Vf.-VNnoJ&hM6Qh8UKpdVyGZt^E||!q:/(|v,7v7^k}i>"KSszS$K.Pq$rh\O4=lU%}=$>LilYVf>I _go-i,==|26MWcX^5MsCKq mPvX@m >d W]XYc@@l=xlBie u}.f%u _& y !6y ~p. While trying to fake answers is ill-advised, with the right coaching and practice, you can improve your chances of success. y"AR,gR. The statement I dress for work so I can blend into the crowd is similar to statements in the HDSsColorfulwhich tries to assess how attention-seeking you are. 0000091288 00000 n Karsten Stueber Each report has three sections. 0000004893 00000 n Your responses to questions are translated into scores, which are organized by scale. perspective taking. The development and validity of each scale is discussed as well as the scales' relation to measures of personality and moral conduct and character. First, some of these scales do not distinguish between an affective and a cognitive component of empathy. It is a self- 0000009050 00000 n Rather than trying to Fake it, put yourself in the mindset of the role you are trying to land. If you are completely new to the concept of personality testing, try to find some adequate free personality tests that offer feedback. disposition as it is defined by the author. [j b|Tq\sw|VA conception of empathy presumed by the authors of the questionnaire or the existence of intelligence by testing for capacities directly The MVPI asks you to respond True, False, or Undecided to questions that measure your core goals, values, drives, and interests to see the type of role where you would be most productive. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307-316. Mehrabian and Epsteins the questionnaire does not seem to probe directly for empathy, since it In the same study, Get a good nights sleep the night before, and have a healthy meal before taking the test. 0000101056 00000 n For example, the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (Spreng et al., 2009) presents empathy . 0000002042 00000 n situation, by studying the facial, gestural, and vocal indices Hogan calls this test a look at the bright side, as it looks at your personality on your best day. It will introduce you to personality tests, the different question formats you may encounter, and how to approach the test in a way that will significantly increase your chances of success. Hb```a``[ @QG@B of empathy-related responding (Zhou, Valiente, and Eisenberg widely used measures, the Hogan Empathy Scale and the Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE). Ickes (1993, 2003, chap.7 ), that the lack of correlation indicates New user? seem to test directly for affective empathy. the measurement of cognitive empathy as a stable disposition and A systematic review. In developing the IRI, Davis gathered an initial pool of over 50 items, some of which were taken from existing measures of empathy, but the majority were new, original items designed to asses either cognitive aspects of empathy or a range of emotional responses to observed experiences of others.Each item consists of a self-statement, and responses are provided on 5-point Likert-type scales . There are three tests in the Hogan Assessment. 0000091081 00000 n Using the links below, you can: . quotient (EQ), defines empathy as including a cognitive Type of Element: Self-Report. Staying calm is critical, but you need to remain calm and show them why you are the best candidate for the job. peoplewho were independently identified as either Author R Hogan. any empathy scale relying on self-reports. clear that the questionnaire would be less appropriate if one were to They also might vary according Your strengths and success factors, how well you may do at the job, Your potential derailers at work; factors that might undermine your success at the job, The fit level between your core goals, beliefs, and personal values on the one hand, and the work environment and organizational culture on the other hand, I find myself curious about how things operate, You are open to feedback, but can be moody and self-critical, You are calm and steady under pressure, but might be resistant to feedback, Youre a good team player and let others take the lead, but may be complacent, You are energetic and competitive, but may be restless and forceful, Youre good at working alone and staying quiet, but you may be socially reactive, You are outgoing, talkative, and attention-seeking, Youre direct and frank, but can be cold and tough, You are friendly and warm, but avoid conflict, Youre flexible, open-minded, and impulsive, You are organized, dependable and inflexible, You are imaginative, but may be a poor implementor, Youre a hands-on learner but technology-averse, Youre interested in learning but intolerant of the uninformed, I set high standards for my work performance, You seem calm to the point where you lack passion or urgency, You display dramatic emotional peaks and valleys regarding projects and people, You seem to be cynical and expect betrayal, You are willing to take risks without careful consideration, You avoid risk regardless of risk assessment, You are overly concerned about the feelings of others, You are passive-aggressive and agenda-driven, You are assertive and overly self-confident, You seek attention and are socially prominent, You are unpredictable and offer unusual ideas, You pay poor attention to detail and over-delegate, It is more important to be satisfied with your job than to have job security, My teams performance reflects on my performance, I do not like it when work interferes with my time at home, You prefer to share credit, and avoid getting attention, You value acknowledgement and prefer high-visibility projects, You value fun and prefer open-minded environments, You value independence and prefer to work alone, You value challenging the way things have always been done, You prefer consistency and predictability, You value relationships over profitability, You value practicality and prefer routines, Untimed, although most people complete each test in 15-20 minutes, Hogan scores are delivered in percentile format, compared to large samples of working adults of similar profession. %PDF-1.3 % Disclaimer All the information and prep materials on iPrep are genuine and were created for tutoring purposes. Purpose of Study: The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) is a . For example, answering Agree to a question that asks whether others take advantage of you might disqualify you for a managerial position but position you for an assistant role.